Skip to main content

Writink Services

NURS FPX 8006 Assessment 2 Apply System Thinking to Support and Produce Quality, Efficiency, and Cost-Effective Outcomes

NURS FPX 8006 Assessment 2 Apply System Thinking to Support and Produce Quality, Efficiency, and Cost-Effective Outcomes

NURS FPX 8006 Assessment 2 Apply System Thinking to Support and Produce Quality, Efficiency, and Cost-Effective Outcomes

Student name

Capella University

NURS-FPX8006 Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice

Professor Name

Submission Date

Slide 1

Greetings! I’m ________ and I am going to articulate the approaches utilized by healthcare … systems to lessen the impact of medication errors as a result of system collaboration strategies. In this specific manner, I focus on the Swiss cheese model of error prevention, which assists in my research on the patient safety gaps and the proper strategic alignment of the human, organizational, system, and technology (Wiegmann et al. 2022). In this manner, I will analyze the teamwork activities of the interdisciplinary model in relation to the use of new technology and communication systems in the formulation of new protective strategies aimed at increasing the drug management system safety and reliability and decreasing the overall system cost.

Slide 2

  • Utilizing System Thinking to Enhance Quality, Efficiency, and Cost-Effectiveness

The issue of medication errors in healthcare is quite grave. It poses significant threats to the well-being of patients, incurring exorbitant financial and administrative expenses, and causing harm to patients. The World Health Organization (2024) states that there are millions of injuries due to medication errors every year in the world. Such medication errors that may be encountered at any point in the medication cycle, like prescription, administration, and monitoring, are mostly attributed to system failures and communication issues. To engage in the improvement of the latter, the Swiss cheese model of error prevention will be applied through the application of a defensive combination of clinical decision support systems (CDSS), electronic health records (EHRs), and automated alerts (Wiegmann et al., 2022). According to the model, the right alignment of the layers enhances the weaknesses of the system, thus reducing the likelihood of medication errors with the patient and the organizational requirements.

Slide 3

  • Quality & Outcome Management – Provider Perspectives

Healthcare professionals also bring their professional knowledge to the quality improvement effort and to patient outcomes management. The appropriate medication is given by doctors because they observe the development of the patients and need to change medication when necessary. According to the study of Abdullah et al. (2024), physicians base their medical prescriptions on the conditions of the patients so as to choose the most beneficial treatment options. Drug safety is a practice of nurses that follows the guideline of the five rights, i.e., the right patient, right drug, right amount, right time, and the right route (Hanson and Haddad, 2023).

Medication education that falls under the critical area of nursing practice is medication use and side effect detection. Pharmacists must review all prescriptions appropriately to detect any possible drug interactions and contraindications that would enable them to avoid medication errors and enhance patient safety. Expert drug management under the leadership of pharmacists is an essential part of adverse drug event prevention (Salazar et al., 2022). Infrastructure that is developed by the informatics specialists involves integration of the tools, e.g., the clinical decision support systems, into the digital platforms, which will transfer the communication between the teams and reduce medication errors. Integrated teams of professionals identify a working pattern that ensures medication safety and delivers high-quality patient outcomes and improved care delivery.

Slide 4

  • Negotiating a Collaborative System Approach

To ensure that medication mistakes are minimized, health teams are encouraged to develop open communication patterns, introduce high-tech equipment, simplify the work process, and concentrate on continuous employee training. According to the article by Alhur et al. (2024), it was found that among 1165 healthcare workers (N=1165), 66.7 percent of healthcare professionals knew the current communication protocols, and 29.1 percent of them were unaware of the protocols, which means that it is important to adopt standardized procedures to prevent errors. One of the essential requirements in the practice of healthcare is the incorporation of clinical decision support systems (CDSS) and electronic health records (EHRs) systems. By integrating pharmacist-led medication management systems, the medication error rates were reduced to 34.2 and 15.3 percent, and the study demonstrated the benefits of the technology in medication safety (Mostafa et al., 2020).

Improved coordination and streamlining of the workflows have been demonstrated to reduce the negative drug incidents (Ackerhans et al., 2024). Interprofessional education plays a key role in medication safety because health professionals can develop better teamwork and safer medication habits. Students accept medication-focused interprofessional education activities. In addition, these activities do improve collaboration skills (Grimes and Guinan, 2022). Those interprofessional teams that have worked in healthcare build a collaboration system that augments medication safety and optimizes patient outcomes, while further bolstering effective healthcare delivery.

Slide 5

  • Supporting Outcomes Across the Continuum of Care

The collaborative systems approach improves the outcomes along the spectrum of care in a meaningful manner by assisting in the communication and coordination of unrestricted health professionals at all levels of patient care. The integration of technologies, like clinical decision support systems and electronic health records, will enable health teams to share patient information without any trouble, which is a prerequisite to offering standard, patient-centered care (Zhao et al., 2023). The usefulness of interprofessional collaboration is determined by the studies, and it is proven that joint interventions among the physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and informaticists contribute to better decision-making and a decrease in drug errors (Alhur et al., 2024).

Consequently, patient satisfaction and safety have improved. The collaborative practice facilitates care transitions that generally form pivotal points on the continuum of care. A study conducted by Ackerhans et al. (2024) made sure that the significant decrease in the number of negative drug events in general and those within a hospital-to-discharge transition, in particular, was observed following the standardization of the communication practices and simplification of the workflow. The collaborative system strategy facilitates continuity of care as it closes the gaps in communication, enhances the communication process in the process of handing over the care, and keeps the entire team on track with the patient’s care plan. The approach lowers the readmission rates and patient outcomes.

Slide 6

  • Efficiency and Process Improvement

The proposed solution to drug management can be explained by the evidence-based practices, which have proven to raise the safety and quality of care levels. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) offered real-time alerts and evidence-based suggestions that were efficient in the minimization of drug errors among healthcare employees. The study conducted by Shahmoradi et al. (2021) showed that the clinical decision support system in a healthcare setting generated new evidence regarding the reduction of medication errors and improved patient care. Medication reconciliation is the most urgent task which makes sure that ensures the patient’s drug lists are correct in any transfer of healthcare. With the help of standard medication reconciliation procedures, the levels of patient safety and the number of medication errors can, to a great extent, be improved. Systematic medication reconciliation and the reduction of prescription errors that were made by Alghamdi et al. (2023) also correlate with the range of prescription errors. For these reasons, the importance of these steps in the reduction of medication errors is emphasized.

The electronic systems, which were integrated with barcodes, helped in minimizing transcription mistakes and improving accuracy in medication distribution. Osmani et al. (2022) have shown in two studies that e-prescribing improves the effectiveness of the prescribing process and reduces errors in the medication system. Heip et al. (2020) demonstrated that the median of medication errors decreased significantly, and interprofessional rounds enhanced the quality of care of the team members overall. It has been shown that the safety of drugs used by the patient can be improved as the healthcare providers discuss the patient care in joint interprofessional rounds. The healthcare organizations improve processes in order to realize improved medication management, leading to safer care of patients. The systematic medication reconciliation and electronic prescribing with barcoding and interprofessional collaboration contribute to the overall medication safety of the healthcare system to provide patient benefit in the diverse care environments.

Slide 7

  • Cost Management & Return on Investment

Implementation of clinical decision support systems (CDSS) and interdisciplinary training leads to a significant cost benefit in the short and long term. Healthcare organizations that have experience of 3-5 years may expect that the medication-related readmission costs would be decreased, and this would save the organization 25 billion dollars per year (Massetti, 2023). This decrease in liability costs is due to the adoption of measures to prevent errors because organizations are less likely to become the subjects of legal claims (Massetti, 2023). The case of interdisciplinary training and CDSS implementation leads to long-term organizational savings when it comes to the reduction of drug-related adverse events (ADEs) over 5-10 years (Fernández et al., 2020). According to Fernandez et al. (2020), family expenses and emotional burden are minimized in situations where complications are minimized. The net financial benefits to the healthcare bodies of their investments exceed the initial expenditure because they bring about not only financial benefits but also improved patient outcomes.

Slide 8

  • Conclusion

The safety of patients and patient outcomes may be enhanced when the collaborative interprofessional intervention in medication errors prevention is supported by technology, including clinical decision support systems (CDSS) and electronic prescribing. Ongoing staff training and system optimization are essential to maximize the effectiveness of these technological tools. The new evidence of research shows that such measures are effective in preventing medication errors, enhancing communication within healthcare teams, and lowering the economic cost burden placed by healthcare systems and patients. The value of investment in such systems and the steps that will lead to the improvement of the quality of healthcare provision can be illustrated by the benefits that can be achieved in the long term (e.g., cost-saving and improved patient welfare).

Struggling with NURS FPX 8006 Assessment 2? Writink Services provides expert step-by-step guidance and proven tips to ace your grades fast!

Step-by-Step Instructions to write

NURS FPX 8006 Assessment 2

Contact us to receive step-by-step instructions.

Instruction file for
NURS FPX 8006 Assessment 2

Contact us to get the instruction file.

Scoring Guide for
NURS FPX 8006 Assessment 2

Contact us to get the scoring guide.

References for
NURS FPX 8006 Assessment 2

Abdullah, M. A., Ahmed, A. S., Shaikh, B. T., Kaleem, M. B., Sumbal, A., & Naeem, Z. (2024). Prescription practices of physicians, quality of care, and patients’ safety: A mixed methods comprehensive study. International Journal of Health Sciences, 18(1), 29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10768469/

Ackerhans, S., Huynh, T., Kaiser, C., & Schultz, C. (2024). Exploring the role of professional identity in the implementation of clinical decision support systems—A narrative review. Implementation Science, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-024-01339-x

Alghamdi, D. S., Alhrasen, M., Kassem, A., Alwagdani, A., Tourkmani, A. M., Alnowaiser, N., Barakah, Y. A., & Alotaibi, Y. K. (2023). Implementation of medication reconciliation at admission and discharge in Ministry of Defense Health Services hospitals: A multicentre study. Open Quality, 12(2), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002121

Alhur, A., Alhur, A. A., Al-Rowais, D., Asiri, S., Muslim, H., Alotaibi, D., Al-Rowais, B., Alotaibi, F., Al-Hussayein, S., Alamri, A., Faya, B., Rashoud, W., Alshahrani, R., Alsumait, N., & Alqhtani, H. (2024). Enhancing patient safety through effective interprofessional communication: A focus on medication error prevention. Cureus, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.57991

Fernández, E. V., Warriner, C. L., David, T., Gordon, E., Twigg, G., & Carroll, N. V. (2020). Potential cost savings by prevention of adverse drug events with a novel medication review program. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, 60(3), 462-469.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2019.12.004

Grimes, T., & Guinan, E. (2022). Interprofessional education focused on medication safety: A systematic review. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 37(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2021.2015301

Hanson, A., & Haddad, L. M. (2023, September 4). Nursing rights of medication administration. PubMed; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560654/

Heip, T., Malfait, S., & Eeckloo, K. (2020). The effects of interdisciplinary bedside rounds on patient centeredness, quality of care, and team collaboration. Journal of Patient Safety, 20(18), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/pts.0000000000000695

NURS FPX 8006 Assessment 2 Apply System Thinking to Support and Produce Quality, Efficiency, and Cost-Effective Outcomes

Massetti, C. (2023). Risk factors for medication-related short-term readmissions in adults – A scoping review. Health Services Research, 23(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10028-2

Mostafa, L. S., Sabri, N. A., El-Anwar, A. M., & Shaheen, S. M. (2019). Evaluation of pharmacist-led educational interventions to reduce medication errors in emergency hospitals: A new insight into patient care. Journal of Public Health, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdy216

Osmani, F., Osmani, M., & Shahali, Z. (2022). Evaluation of the effectiveness of electronic prescription in reducing medical and medical errors. American Pharmacists Association, 81(3), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharma.2022.12.002

Salazar, A., Amato, M. G., Shah, S. N., Khazen, M., Aminmozaffari, S., Klinger, E. V., Volk, L. A., Mirica, M., & Schiff, G. D. (2022). Pharmacists’ role in detection and evaluation of adverse drug reactions: Developing proactive systems for pharmacosurveillance. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxac325

Shahmoradi, L., Safdari, R., Ahmadi, H., & Zahmatkeshan, M. (2021). Clinical decision support systems-based interventions to improve medication outcomes: A systematic literature review on features and effects. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 35(27), 27. https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.35.27

Wiegmann, D. A., J. Wood, L., N. Cohen, T., & Shappell, S. A. (2022). Understanding the “Swiss cheese model” and its application to patient safety. Journal of Patient Safety, Publish Ahead of Print (2), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1097/pts.0000000000000810

World Health Organization. (2024). Medication without harm. Who.int. https://www.who.int/initiatives/medication-without-harm

Zhao, C., Liang, N., Zhang, H., Li, H., Yang, Y., Zong, X., Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Shi, N. (2023). Harnessing the power of clinical decision support systems: Challenges and opportunities. Open Heart, 10(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2023-002432

Capella Professors to choose from for
NURS-FPX8006

  • Andrea Jackson.

  • Maxine Jeffery.

FAQ’s For
NURS FPX 8006 Assessment 2

Question 1: Where can I find assessment help for NURS FPX 8006 Assessment 2?

Answer 1: You can find assessment help for NURS FPX 8006 Assessment 2 at writinkservices.com.

Question 2: What is NURS FPX 8006 Assessment 2 Apply System Thinking to Support and Produce Quality, Efficiency, and Cost-Effective Outcomes?

Answer 2: NURS FPX 8006 Assessment 2 is a system-thinking healthcare quality presentation.

← Previous Assessment: NURS FPX 8006 Assessment 1 | Next Assessment: NURS FPX 8006 Assessment 3 →

Don't have time to write? Get Free Quote

    Your information will be securely sent to and stored in Google Sheets for the purpose of processing your form submission.

    Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading

    Please enter your correct contact information to view the sample paper

    Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.