NURS FPX 6222 Assessment 5 Planning for Change A Leader’s Vision
Student name
Capella University
NURS-FPX6222 Healthcare Safety and Quality Management
Professor Name
Submission Date
Planning for Change: A Leader’s Vision
An effective organizational change effort is based on effective leadership, and the situation in a healthcare setting, where the quality of care and patient safety directly impact the lives of patients, is no exception. When an individual incorporates an existing, evidence-based vision as the guiding body of change, this leader will inspire an interdisciplinary workforce, distribute resources prudently, and develop a culture of continuous improvement. Leaders who promote accountability, transparency, and shared decision-making generate the most recurring measurable change in the direction of organizational excellence and patient-centered care (Heim et al., 2025). This evaluation is carried out to find out how the organization can enhance its culture of quality and safety.
Key Quality and Safety Outcomes
The nursing care score of the primary care clinic is slightly below average and is indicative of dire systemic flaws in the domains of staffing, training, and accountability. To solve this problem on a short-term scale, a systematic course of action is required to establish a safety culture. This plan will be based on the introduction of evidence-based nurse-to-patient staffing ratios since poor nurse-to-patient staffing will undermine all other quality improvement processes (Batiha, 2025).
Moreover, uniform bedside activities like hourly rounding, SBAR communication, and competency-based training will assist in reducing variability of care and securing homogeneous and responsible nursing practices in all departments (Ghonem & El-Husany, 2023). Moreover, a continuous quality improvement program will offer real-time safety dashboards and multidisciplinary team collaboration meetings to the leadership to have constant and transparent performance measures (Dietl et al., 2023). All these efforts will yield accountability, transparency, and transformational leadership that will lead to long-lasting patient satisfaction, infection prevention, pressure ulcer prevention, and quality outcomes sensitive to nurses.
Assumptions Underlying the Plan
This proposed plan presupposes that the organization is financially able to make changes in the style of staffing, training and technology that will be required to move forward. It further presupposes that nursing staff will not be opposed to collaborative work as they will participate in the competency-based education; thus, leadership will also be prolifically supportive of the implementation of evidence-based practice in all units of the organization. All the interdisciplinary teams will also collaborate with each other in a collaborative manner on quality improvement efforts as well.
Existing Organizational Functions, Processes, and Behaviors
The primary care clinic has a number of organizational-level processes and functions that are dysfunctional and add to the low score of the clinic on the nursing care aspect. To illustrate, within healthcare organizations, staffing, leadership, and organizational culture weaknesses are common systemic factors that result in quality and safety failures and collectively lead to poor patient outcomes (Singh et al., 2024). On the same note, the literature states that in the absence of a proper quality improvement structure, evidence-based nursing practice can hardly be maintained in all the hospital units (Alsadaan and Ramadan, 2025).
Moreover, the absence of uniformized bedside practices (e.g., structured rounding, SBAR communication, etc.) has resulted in a significant amount of inconsistency in terms of how care is provided, and this has led to the rise in HAIs and the development of pressure ulcers. Hierarchical organizational culture forms contra-indicators to report errors and instills no psychological safety among the frontline nurses; consequently, interventions are not timely provided, and the systemic problems remain unaddressed throughout the organization, which directly leads to the continuing poor outcomes in nurse-sensitive quality (Lee & Lee, 2024).
Knowledge Gaps and Areas of Uncertainty
Currently, one lacks sufficient data points to make a specification of the very cause of low nursing care scores at the clinic. The demographics of the patients, their level of acuity, and how they relate to its organizational culture are still poorly represented and documented. Contextual analysis has been constrained as such. No information is available on compliance with staffing, competency evaluation, and compliance with hourly rounding and compliance with SBAR. Moreover, it is not demonstrated that any active quality improvement initiatives are implemented at the moment.
Current Outcome Measures Related to Quality and Safety
The primary care clinic will use four major measures to monitor the quality and safety outcomes in terms of the nursing and bedside care given to patients with complex medical needs. The response, respect, and clinical competence of the nursing staff in terms of their nursing work with patients will be reflected in the patient satisfaction scores in the hospitalization process (Ferreira et al., 2023). The frequency of hospital-acquired infections will be used to monitor compliance with the evidence by carrying out the relevant hygiene prevention activities at the bedside (Hajiyeva et al., 2025). Incidents of pressure ulcers will present more information on whether nursing staff are adhering to the required protocols in conducting skin assessment and/or repositioning of patients. The total number of nurse-sensitive care quality scores all total is the overall effect of bedside nursing practices on patient safety and organizational excellence.
Strengths and Weaknesses of Current Outcome Measures
The value of the four measures of outcomes is that they are standardized, benchmarked nationally, and easy to track. Due to this fact, they allow nursing leadership to recognize the gaps in performance and focus their efforts on improving the quality according to the quantitative data. Among them are patient satisfaction scores, hospital-acquired infection rates, the prevalence of pressure ulcers, and patient quality indicators regarding nurse-sensitive care; all of them will provide a general picture of where the performance gaps in the bedside area are located so that the nursing leaders can use the data to help identify where they can focus their quality improvement efforts (Ferreira et al., 2023).
Studies have also established that standardized outcome measures can be used in holding organizations to account and help leaders make decisions using evidence when the measures are compared to national standards of those measures (Fukami, 2024). Another way in which these outcome measures fail to measure up is that they are reactive and not proactive, and only emerge to recognize areas of deficiency once the damage is done.
Steps Needed to Achieve Improved Outcomes
To effectively apply a progressive, gradual approach to bridge the performance gap in nursing at the primary care clinic and then record quantifiable quality improvement and safety results, the initial task of this project will be to develop evidence-based nurse-patient staffing ratios within every unit. Proper staffing is the basis of any future quality improvement effort. Variability in care will be minimized by the introduction of standard protocols at the bedside (such as hourly rounding, the use of SBAR communication, and the compulsory training of the staff on competency) (Blakeney et al., 2024). The real-time monitoring should be implemented based on patient safety dashboards and multidisciplinary teams to monitor progress through continuous quality improvement programs (Azadmanjir et al., 2024). Lastly, transformational to transactional leadership changes encourage continued accountability, psychological safety and a culture of continuous improvement regarding evidence-based best practices throughout the enterprise.
Assumptions Underlying the Plan
It is assumed that the organization will be financially stable and committed to instituting long-term staffing, training, and technological transformation. The nursing staff will also promote competency-based nurse education; furthermore, leadership support will be robust towards transformational changes. The interdisciplinary team is also expected to collaborate, and organizational culture is also expected to be ready to engage in continuous quality improvement.
Future Vision for a Culture of Quality and Safety
It is possible to reorganize the clinic into a well-performing organization whose nursing practice and corporate culture are characterized by respect towards quality and safety. Transformational leadership, evidence-based staffing model, bedside procedure protocols, and continuous quality improvement model implementation will enable this clinic to achieve consistently high or higher benchmark measurement statistics (Ystaas et al., 2023). Subsequent clients will be provided with outstanding care in a setting where frontline nurses will be psychologically secure, provide care in teams, and make medical decisions in a timely and proactive manner, based on real-time information on complex patient needs (Dietl et al., 2023).
Nurse Leader’s Role in Developing Organizational Potential
Nursing leaders are significant participants in the transformation of the quality and safety culture of the primary care clinics through their functions as the representatives of the evidence-based practice and the right staffing proportion. Transformational leadership style applied to nurse leaders will also help them to foster a psychological safety atmosphere where they can report their mistakes without the fear of punishment (Ystaas et al., 2023).
Constant participation and engagement of nursing personnel in quality improvement programs by a real-time safety dashboard and accountability frameworks on nursing performance should be supported (Alsadaan, 2023). The nurse leaders can account for this by offering a visible and documented supportive leadership style through evidence-based leadership principles, which provide a work environment that will sustain the momentum created by their organization to succeed in the long term. It can also assist in narrowing the existing gap in the performance of the nursing staff.
Opportunities for Interprofessional Collaboration
The quality and safety of care provided in the primary care clinic may be greatly improved because a consistent inter-professional model of collaboration between nurses, physicians, infection control experts, wound care teams, and patient safety officers should be created and put into practice. As it has been shown, communication between providers is increased when the models are designed collaboratively, the variability of care delivery is reduced, and the number of nurse-sensitive quality indicators and patient satisfaction increases (Jenstad et al., 2024).
Scheduling Multidisciplinary meetings at regular periods will also give the means of creating a shared responsibility towards improvement in performance with respect to the four established evidence-based outcomes, since it promotes the idea that no single discipline can effectively handle the whole load of quality improvement (Majrashi et al., 2025). Building working partnerships will further contribute to quantitative and sustainable transformations in patient safety, infection prevention, pressure ulcer prevention, and nursing excellence in general.
Conclusion
Achieving a sustainable culture of quality and safety will be within one of the primary care clinics by use of transformational leadership, evidence-based staffing, bedside standard practices, and inter-professional collaboration. To assist in bridging the gap in nursing performance, organizations have to be dedicated to continuous improvement, accountability for the actions taken, and open communication with the stakeholders in the system. Through resolving any systemic problems, filling any knowledge gaps, and empowering the nurses at the point of service to facilitate and maintain quantifiable best care results in patient-centered care, a primary care clinic can likely meet its objective of offering outstanding patient care.
Struggling with NURS FPX 6222 Assessment 5? Get step-by-step guidance, proven strategies, and examples from Writink Services to ace your grades fast.
Step By Step Instructions to write
NURS FPX 6222 Assessment 5
Contact us to receive step-by-step instructions.
Instruction file for
NURS FPX 6222 Assessment 5
Contact us to get the instruction file.
Scoring Guide for
NURS FPX 6222 Assessment 5
Contact us to get scoring guide.
References for
NURS FPX 6222 Assessment 5
Alsadaan, N. (2023). Impact of nurse leaders behaviors on nursing staff performance: A systematic review of literature. Inquiry: A Journal of Medical Care Organization, Provision and Financing, 60, e00469580231178528. https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580231178528
Alsadaan, N., & Ramadan, O. M. E. (2025). Barriers and facilitators in implementing evidence-based practice: A parallel cross-sectional mixed methods study among nursing administrators. BioMed Central Nursing, 24(1), 403. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03059-z
Azadmanjir, Z., Naini, M. S., Dashtkoohi, M., Lakeh, M. M., Arabkheradmand, J., Harrop, J. S., & Movaghar, V. R. (2024). The design of a quality improvement dashboard for monitoring spinal cord and column injuries. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, 47, e101489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2024.101489
Batiha, A. M. (2025). Evaluating nurse-to-patient ratio legislation to improve patient safety and care quality: A mixed-methods policy study. Applied Nursing Research, 84, e151989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2025.151989
Blakeney, E. A.-R., Chu, F., White, A. A., Smith, G. R., Woodward, K., Lavallee, D. C., Salas, R. M. E., Beaird, G., Willgerodt, M. A., Dang, D., Dent, J. M., Tanner, E. I., Summerside, N., Zierler, B. K., O’Brien, K. D., & Weiner, B. J. (2024). A scoping review of new implementations of interprofessional bedside rounding models to improve teamwork, care, and outcomes in hospitals. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 38(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2021.1980379
Dietl, J. E., Derksen, C., Keller, F. M., & Lippke, S. (2023). Interdisciplinary and interprofessional communication intervention: How psychological safety fosters communication and increases patient safety. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(14), e1164288. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1164288
Ferreira, D. C., Vieira, I., Pedro, M. I., Caldas, P., & Varela, M. (2023). Patient satisfaction with healthcare services and the techniques used for its assessment: A systematic literature review and a bibliometric analysis. Healthcare, 11(5), 639. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11050639
Fukami, T. (2024). Enhancing healthcare accountability for administrators: Fostering transparency for patient safety and quality enhancement. Cureus, 16(8), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.66007
NURS FPX 6222 Assessment 5 Planning for Change A Leader’s Vision
Ghonem, N. M. E.-S., & El-Husany, W. A. (2023). SBAR shift report training program and its effect on nurses’ knowledge and practice and their perception of shift handoff communication. SAGE Open Nursing, 9(1), e23779608231159340. https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608231159340
Hajiyeva, A., Jarl, J., & Saha, S. (2025). The effectiveness of quality management interventions in reducing hospital-associated infections in adult patients: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 154, e107837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2025.107837
Heim, I., Laker, B., & Tabaeifard, S. J. (2025). Responsible leadership: A systematic literature review, theoretical framework, and future research directions. Journal of Business Research, 203, e115801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115801
Jenstad, L. M., Howe, T., Breau, G., Abel, J., Colozzo, P., Halas, G., Mason, G., Rieger, C., Simon, L., & Strachan, S. (2024). Communication between healthcare providers and communicatively-vulnerable patients with associated health outcomes: A scoping review of knowledge syntheses. Patient Education and Counseling, 119(1), e108040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2023.108040
Lee, S. E., & Lee, J. W. (2024). Effects of hierarchical unit culture and power distance orientation on nurses’ silence behavior: The roles of perceived futility and hospital management support for patient safety. Journal of Nursing Management, 2024(1), e6564570. https://doi.org/10.1155/jonm/6564570
Majrashi, K. M. N. Y., Al Dawsari, H. R. N., Alaklabi, S. A. S., Alghamdi, A. N. S., Al-Subaie, M. F. M., Miqad, M. S., Alghamdi, S. M. K., Almotuiri, S. H. N., Al Otaibi, Y. B. H., Maydie, K. Y. A., Alamri, S. A., Al Bugami, R. M. Z., AMansou, S. S. F., Al-Otaibi, A. D. euid, & Thamiri, A. A. A. (2025). A multidisciplinary model for quality improvement and patient safety in military healthcare systems. Journal of Clinical Practice and Medical Research, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.59324/jcpmr.2025.1(3).30
Singh, G., Patel, R. H., & Boster, J. (2024). Root cause analysis and medical error prevention. PubMed; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK570638/
Ystaas, L. M. K., Nikitara, M., Ghobrial, S., Latzourakis, E., Polychronis, G., & Constantinou, C. S. (2023). The impact of transformational leadership in the nursing work environment and patients’ outcomes: A systematic review. Nursing Reports, 13(3), 1271–1290. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep13030108
Capella Professors to choose from for
NURS-FPX6222
Buddy Wiltcher.
Jen Carroll.
FAQ’s For
NURS FPX 6222 Assessment 5
Question 1: Where can I find assessment help for NURS FPX 6222 Assessment 5?
Answer 1: You can find assessment help for NURS FPX 6222 Assessment 5 at writinkservices.com.
Question 2: What is NURS FPX 6222 Assessment 5 Planning for Change A Leader’s Vision?
Answer 2: NURS FPX 6222 Assessment 5 focuses on planning change for improving healthcare quality and safety.
Previous Assessment: