Skip to main content

Writink Services

NURS FPX 6085 Assessment 2 Problem Statement (PICOT)

NURS FPX 6085 Assessment 2 Problem Statement (PICOT)

NURS FPX 6085 Assessment 2 Problem Statement (PICOT)

Student name

Capella University

NURS-FPX 6085 MSN Practicum and Capstone

Professor Name

Submission Date

 

Problem Statement (PICOT)

One of the stressors of new graduate nurses in a busy urban hospital, namely, in the unit of women’s services, is the transition-to-practice phase, because of the high acuity and rapid-paced clinical situations that are common in the unit. Despite the existing models of orientation and preceptorship, the training of new nurses to be competent in managing complex patient scenarios with confidence and safety continues to have gaps, which further strain the training process, variable practice quality, and jeopardize patient safety. Major aspects in this project deal with needs identified, target population, intervention proposed, expected results, schedule, and quality improvement framework. Does the use of an organized, evidence-based educational program (including simulation-based learning and specific orientation activities) (I) versus the current standard orientation program (C) to improve clinical readiness, confidence, and the capacity to address the common and high-acuity situation in women services (O) in a 6-12 week orientation period (T) in new graduate nurses (P) who are making the transition to practice in a busy urban hospital

Population (P): Nurses new to practice in a unit of a busy urban hospital with a female population.

Intervention (I): Evidence-based intervention, structured educational intervention: Simulation-based learning and orienting interventions.

Comparison (C): Existing standard orientation process.

Outcome (O): More prepared to clinically, better-confident, and safer handling of common and high-acuity clinical situations.

Time (T): 6 to 12 weeks.

Problem Statement

  • Need Analysis

The need identified in this project revolves around quality improvement, nurse education, and patient safety through the implementation of a structured and evidence-based educational intervention for the new graduate nurses, including simulation-based learning and specific orientation activities. New graduate nurses often work in the high-acuity units of women’s services or neonatal units with high workloads in large metropolitan hospitals without sufficient training on how to deal with complex obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal cases. Such knowledge deficits in the preparation process expose patients and nurses to an increased risk of clinical error, loss of confidence, and lower quality of care. The existing literature suggests that the lack of stress, burnout, and unsafe clinical practice is the result of insufficient transition-to-practice programs among new nurses (Reebals et al., 2021).

In terms of the organizational data, internal quality reports within related units of women’s services indicate that new graduate nurses are more likely to be involved in near-miss medication errors, delayed identification of maternal deterioration, and inability to escalate care in the case of obstetric emergencies during the first three months of practice. Furthermore, nurse educators lament that there is unequal preceptor assessment in which, in most cases, there are records of absence of emergency response, interpretation of fetal monitoring, and interdisciplinary communication during the orientation phase (Ibrahim et al., 2024).

Although formal simulation competency scores are not actively tracked, the present orientation completion is based more on time-related aspects than on clinical competency, limiting objective evaluation of independence of practice readiness. This project makes the assumption that the simulation resources and teaching facilities are available in the organization to support the intervention. Factors that may have contributed to this problem include variation in the orientation structure, insufficiency in clinical simulation of cases in the high-acuity unit, and early transition without mentored clinical decision-making (Elendu et al., 2024).

New graduate nurses have been reported to lack preparedness to confront emergency or high-risk situations in their services to women, which negatively impacts patient safety and retention of nurses. These educational gaps result in a potential for poor patient outcomes, staff turnover, and low-quality care. The current unit level data also shows that there is a higher turnover of nurses with less than a year of experience in women’s services, which shows that lack of preparation is also a contributing factor to not only a safety hazard, but also a fluctuating workforce. These trends have the power to demonstrate that it is not only educational, but also operational and financial in nature, and that quality improvement in transition-to-practice is not only urgent, but also desperate (Gautam et al., 2023). It is also assumed that the unit nurse educators, preceptors, and leadership will play a positive role in the integration of simulation-based learning as an evidence-based approach to improving clinical competence and confidence during the transition-to-practice process.

  • Population and Setting

The population of the proposed project is the new graduate nurses who enter into a busy hospital in an urban environment within the unit of women’s services. This group is especially vulnerable during the first period of transition, when it lacks clinical experience, and the workload is significant, and the maternal and neonatal patient care is rather complex (Mohammed et al., 2025). Quick clinical judgment, high level of technical skills (as well as good interprofessional communication) are required in women’s services units, so that they can practice safely; they need efficient education preparation. Other difficulties that this group of people can face are performance anxiety, fear of making mistakes, difficulty prioritizing care in an emergency, and a low level of confidence in communication with the physicians and senior nurses in an emergency. Moreover, the lack of exposure to obstetric and neonatal crises in nursing school and the varying levels of education may cause varying degrees of baseline competency differences among orientation nurses and new graduate nurses. These factors might affect readiness to learn, involvement in simulators, and transition success overall.

The intervention site will be in an acute care hospital that facilitates nurse residency training and education using simulation. This environment facilitates the inclusion of realistic clinical situations, directed practice, and systematic feedback in the orientation process. To be more specific, the targeted environment is an inpatient women’s services unit of a large urban hospital with labor and delivery, postpartum, and neonatal services, where patient acuity is high, and the condition of clinical degradation can occur rapidly. The most frequent obstetric emergencies that these units have to handle are, but are not limited to, postpartum bleeding, preeclampsia, and newborn resuscitation.

Training founded on competencies is paramount in patient safety. Potential barriers include time constraints during the orientation process, a shortage of staff, and inconsistency of the support offered by the preceptors, yet institutional commitment to nurse education and patient safety would help in the successful implementation and sustainability. The absence of simulation laboratories due to conflicting educational needs, scheduling differences between clinical shifts and training, as well as uneven support of the leadership depending on the staffing needs, can also be regarded as other setting-specific problems (Park et al., 2025). To address these challenges, the nursing educators, the unit managers, and the hospital administration will be forced to liaise with each other to ensure that the training time is not sacrificed and the preceptors are involved in the training process regularly.

  • In-Intervention Overview

The proposed intervention in this project is a planned, evidence-based educational intervention among new graduate nurses in the women’s services unit that integrates simulation-based education and orientation of the new nurses in the unit. The program will be targeted to promote clinical preparedness, confidence, and safe decision-making in common and high acuity maternal and neonatal scenarios. Facilitated simulation practices, case learning practices, and formal clinical skill validation practices will be held between new graduate nurses and nurse educators and preceptors. Over the 6-12 week orientation process, feedback, self-reflection, and performance evaluation will be used to evaluate the progress and help the trainees develop their skills (Salem et al., 2025).

This approach emphasizes experience and learning, critical thinking, and life-long learning support in the transition-to-practice phase. New graduate nurses in a busy urban women’s unit of service are particularly well placed to benefit from this intervention because the issue is a lack of exposure to clinical practice, high patient acuity, and anxiety of performance that is often experienced in the first years of professional practice. Simulation-oriented education gives a chance to nurses to train in the field of emergency response, communication, and technical abilities in a safe and controlled environment without any harm to the patient (Kavakli and Konukbay, 2024).

The structured orientation model provides training experience similarity and promotes gradual autonomy. In addition, this model of education can be applied at scale and be cost-effective as it is possible to apply it at a broader level to similar inpatient units. The intervention directly targets the main aspects of reduced preparedness and confidence, improvement of clinical competence, and upholding the provision of standardized care. The potential obstacles to implementation may include the absence of time during the orientation schedules, the difference in engagement with a preceptor, and the insufficiency of the staff to conduct simulation activities. The remaining concerns may be the learning habits of new graduate nurses and the opposition towards unorthodox approaches to learning. These obstacles will need to be overcome by institutional support, participation of the leadership, and provision of appropriate resources, which will assist in ensuring continuity and sustainability of the program.

  • Comparison of Approaches

The unit-based preceptorship, classroom instruction, and learning within the framework of routine patient care are the classical approaches to orienting new graduate nurses (Valdes et al., 2021). Although this model can be used to get real-time exposure to clinical practice, this model may not always provide a standardized exposure to high-risk and low-frequency events like obstetric emergencies or neonatal complications. In this way, new nurses may graduate without having an orientation on how to react critically or may not be able to be confident enough to work in high acuity situations alone. Alternative interventions include other interventions like extended nurse residency, interprofessional training that is informed by simulation, and other transition programs facilitated by advanced practice educators. These approaches provide better clinical support, socialization of the profession, and confidence through the assistance of a long-term orientation and a systematic acquisition of skills. However, such programs may be costly to invest in; they may require extra staff, time, and money, which are not always available to invest in all hospital systems (Pradhan et al., 2024).

Other interprofessional models are generalized, not specific to women’s service care, but rather in the nursing competencies. In comparison, a simulation-based orientation program created and facilitated by nurses is balanced as it offers flexibility, realism, and is resource-friendly. The model promotes experiential learning, critical thinking, and repetition of high-acuity situations, interdisciplinary collaboration among nurse teachers, preceptors, and other individuals on an interdisciplinary team. Despite the potential obstacles to such a program, such as the accessibility of simulation, the experience of educators, and the changing policies in terms of training needs, this method is one of the most viable and sustainable ones in high-acuity women’s service environments, instead of the conventional approach to orientation.

  • Initial Outcome

The primary project product will be to enhance the clinical preparedness, confidence, and safe management of typical and critical situations in new graduate nurses by the project completion date, following the orientation program. Baseline information will also be collected at the onset of orientation, and this information will consist of the initial performance scores on the simulation, preceptor competency scores on the standardized evaluation tools, as well as the self-reported confidence scores on the validated confidence scales. Safety event and near-miss event reports of new graduate nurses within the last three months will also be analyzed to establish their pre-intervention safety trends (Yang and Liu, 2021). The improved clinical competence measured through simulation performance tests, preceptor tests, and self-reported surveys of the new graduate nurses are among the secondary outcomes (Alkhelaiwi et al., 2024). These findings will demonstrate that an educational intervention, which entails an organized, simulated training, is suitable to improve the outcomes of transition-to-practice by increasing the performance of the technical skills and professional confidence of the women in the service.

  • SMART outcomes

Minimum 20 percent difference in the scores of simulation-based competency in baseline versus post-orientation measurement.

  • An increase in self-reported confidence scores dealing with obstetric and neonatal emergencies by 25 percent at the end of orientation week 12.
  • Greater improvement in at least one level of performance in sub-areas of clinical judgment, communications, and technical skills on preceptor evaluation rubrics.
  • Reduction in the number of reported near-misses or safety events among new graduate nurses in three months of program implementation by 15% or more.

Evaluator criteria that will be used to assess the accomplishment of these outcomes will include: (1) the quantifiable change in the scores of clinical performance based on simulation in the cases of the scores of the control conditions (the baseline and the post-intervention) (2) the augmented level of self-reported confidence in the skills to handle high-acuity women in the services scenarios (3) the enhanced preceptor evaluation score against the enhanced performance in Combined, these outcome measures are signs of a better quality of care and patient safety and even a better transition-to-practice experience with well-structured educational preparation.

  • Time Estimate

It is estimated that the development and implementation of the educational intervention of training the new graduate nurses based on a structured and simulation-based approach will be implemented in four to five months. The initial month will be dedicated to program planning and design, during which simulation scenarios, designed orientation information, assessment tools, and communication with nurse educators and unit leadership will be created (Lysfjord & Skarstein, 2024). In the second month, preparation of educators and preceptors will be conducted to ensure that all parties are consistent in facilitating the simulations, providing feedback, and evaluating competencies. The implementation of this intervention will then be implemented in three months according to the 6-12-week orientation framework in the PICOT question. Planned simulation sessions, mentored clinical practice, and planned feedback will be used with the new graduate nurses in the transition to independent practice. The potential barriers that may affect the proposed schedule are the delay of the educator training, time scheduling challenges, which can be related to the workforce, or the lack of resources in the simulation laboratory and clinical units.

Quality Improvement Method

The quality improvement model that is going to be implemented in this project is the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle. This model would specifically fit this situation since it is the model that is centered on trial and error, consistent test results, and real-time adaptation based on the results. These features contribute greatly to the evaluation of the effectiveness of the structured educational intervention in the context of simulation-based learning that should be implemented with new graduate nurses in a high-acuity women’s services unit. The PDSA cycle can be used to ensure incremental improvements in the orientation processes, as well as deliver the feedback to the educators and preceptors in a timely manner, and be able to refine the intervention and introduce the most beneficial effect to the nurse readiness, confidence, and patient safety (Abuzied et al., 2023). This approach aligns closely with evidence-based practice principles, which support continuous learning and improvement in clinical settings.

It is assumed that the unit leadership and nurse educators will guide and support the whole process of intervention, and that new graduate nurses, too, will be actively involved in both simulation and learning processes to achieve meaningful results. There will be four phases to be used in the implementation of the PDSA cycle. The Plan stage will help in developing the educational modules, simulation scenarios, and orientation workflows, as well as assessment tools and evaluation criteria. The Do stage will involve application of the program at the unit of women’s services among the new graduate nurses, where guided simulations, structured clinical practice, and feedback by the preceptors will be employed. The study phase will include monitoring of the performance indicators, self-rated level of confidence, and assessment of the preceptors in order to see how well the intervention is working to improve the clinical readiness and competence (Alhejaili et al., 2025). Finally, the stage of Act will translate findings to make the necessary alterations to the orientation program to ensure that it can be scaled, sustained, and aligned to the organizational goals to emerge successful in the practice of nurses.

Literature Review

The phase of transition of new graduate nurses to the practice in high-acuity units of women’s services presents significant difficulties related to clinical preparedness and confidence, as well as safe patient care. The urgency of those issues is that, unless adequately prepared, the chances of making errors, compromising patient safety, and increasing nurse stress and turnover will arise. It was mentioned that the structured educational programs (including simulation-based education and specific orientation programs) can be used to improve clinical competence and confidence during the transition-to-practice period to achieve better staff and patient outcomes (Elendu et al., 2024).

These interventions help to acquire skills, think critically, and socialize professionally in high acuity nursing settings. Elendu et al. (2023) reported that simulation-based learning has created a safe and controlled environment in which to practice on emergency and high-risk scenarios and allows nurses to gain experience and self-confidence without compromising patient safety. Similarly, Kavakli and Konukbay (2024) noted that structured orientation programs excel in terms of clinical judgment development, procedural skills, and interprofessional communication since they are the essential skills in complex care settings. All these studies underline the fact that special educational actions are needed, which should address the needs of women’s services units. Further studies found that the problem of new graduate nurses restricting their exposure to rare high-acuity events, inconsistency of preceptor support, and the lack of formal feedback as a part of orientation were the barriers (Joseph et al., 2022).

Mohammed et al. (2025) also noticed that new nurses may lack confidence, have anxiety, and the rates of errors are more common in the course of coping with obstetric and neonatal emergencies without particular interventions. Repeated practice, guided debriefing, and competency validation have been demonstrated to be effective in overcoming these barriers and ensuring that one is prepared to practice independently. Lastly, interprofessional and evidence-based orientation strategies have shown better results in the new nurse transition programs. Altinbas et al. (2025) performed a review of the simulation and structured mentorship studies, and they found that simulation and structured mentorship programs increase self-efficacy, show better performance of skills, and increase professional satisfaction.

Guerrero et al. (2022) have highlighted that the competence and safety outcomes are reinforced through regular exposure to high-fidelity situations and appraisals with the use of the structured approaches. The literature overall highlights the reality that the gaps that exist in the preparedness, confidence, and safe practice of new graduate nurses in the units of women’s services are appropriate and need to be filled with a systematic simulation-based education intervention to fill the gaps. Ahmed et al. (2025) explored the impact of structured simulation-based learning on the acute care clinical competence of new graduate nurses and discovered that it significantly improved skill performance and confidence, but suggested that it should be complemented with other orientations.

Similarly, Hernawaty et al. (2024) discovered that the targeted orientation activities were related to clinical error reductions, which indicated that the evidence-based educational interventions could be used to reach the ideal state of preparedness during the transition-to-practice stage. According to a recent study by Casia et al. (2025), the connection between improper preparation and high levels of stress, deficiency in confidence, and poor patient safety in newly graduated nurses is linked, which is why the problem of extensive educational programs with a combination of guided practice, feedback, and simulation is addressed. Wang et al. (2025) also pointed out that, as a result of being subjected to stressful situations, and, subsequently, subjected to debriefing of reflections, clinical judgment and decision-making is improved, a highly good point to make in favor of orientation interventions based on simulation.

In conclusion, the literature suggests that the suggested educational intervention grounded on simulation and structured format will be beneficial to new graduate nurses working at women’s services units since the outcomes of the study indicate the increased rates of clinical readiness and higher rates of confidence, and reduced patient care outcomes. Mentoring, training, and modeling offer convenient, graded, and effective ways of building competence in high acuity situations. Besides, the systematic orientation, simulation, and feedback activities are consistent with the existing recommendations, educational best practices, and even the internal policies, as they demonstrate that this kind of intervention is applicable to the target audience and the clinical setting.

  • Evaluation of Relevance and Currency

The chosen literature is highly relevant to the transition-to-practice challenges of new graduate nurses working in the high-acuity units of the women’s services, the approaches of education, learning through simulations, and the structured orientation to improve clinical competence and confidence (Elendu et al., 2024; Kavakli and Konukbay, 2024). Most of the sources were published in 2022- 2025 to have the most recent evidence regarding simulation, guided practice, and competency development in a complex clinical environment (Joseph et al., 2022; Mohammed et al., 2025). The findings will rely on the existing nursing education practice and high-acuity environment that will be useful in the pragmatic design of organized and evidence-based orientation programs (Altinbas et al., 2025; Guerrero et al., 2022). The literature highlights both systemic and individual aspects that contribute to readiness and safe practice and can be employed to address the orientation gaps and exposure to high acuity (Ahmed et al., 2025; Ernawaty et al., 2024). Overall, it could be mentioned that the evidence is timely, applicable, and informative regarding how to enhance the readiness, confidence, and safe patient care in new graduate nurses in women’s services units (Casia et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2025).

Health Policy

Similarly, pertinent health policy and regulatory factors are associated with the success of the delivery of a structured and simulation-based educational intervention onboarding new graduate nurses in the women’s services units. Institutional policies that relate to orientation programs, staffing ratios of the nurses, and competence assessment provide a guideline that ensures sustainability of the program, quality, and adherence to the organizational standards. Evidence-based criteria are also reflected in transitions-to-practice programs, as national nursing education standards and accreditation standards outline such criteria, thus ensuring that the intervention would lead to safe, effective, and consistent patient care (Brunt and Morris, 2023).

Legal and ethical issues, such as the scope of practice, accountability by the profession, etc., also need to be addressed to enable implementation and to make sure that the regulatory standards are not broken. The patient-safety standards by the Joint Commission, especially the ones associated with competence validation, high-risk clinical situations, and prevention of preventable maternal morbidity, require organizations to have well-trained staff, which is regularly assessed, which justifies the importance of simulation, structured orientation, and standardized competency checks. Also, state nurse practice acts and BON (Board of Nursing) regulations require nurses to practice within their competency parameters and demand employers to offer suitable orientation and supervision, which defines the manner in which training has to be provided and recorded.

The safety and exposure risk regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) on workplace safety also warrant the preparation of nurses using simulation to be able to handle obstetric and neonatal emergencies safely. Responsibilities to avoid harm to patients and guarantee safe and evidence-based practice are reinforced by ethical standards like the ANA Code of Ethics, and therefore, need to be fully prepared ethically. To offer confidentiality, professional integrity, and safe learning environments, a policy that covers simulation-based education, records of competency tests, and safe handling of learner data ought to be observed. Equity and accessibility are also imperative as new graduate nurses may have diverse past clinical experiences, learning styles, and familiarity with simulation-based training. The data gaps in the current policies can be linked to the standard approaches to high-acuity orientation, interprofessional collaboration within the context of the transition programs, and regular evaluation of outcomes, i.e., institutional support and policy revisions are needed to promote fair access to quality educational resources (Geese & Schmitt, 2023).

Conclusion

End of training to practice is one of the most important times in the process of ensuring that high-acuity units in women’s services can provide safe and competent clinical practice by new graduate nurses. The change in systematic orientation and high acuity setting can compromise the preparedness of the nurse, confidence, and patient safety. A designed learning intervention in the form of a structured intervention and simulation-based intervention that will be provided by nurse educators will enhance clinical competence, confidence, and skill to manage more complex patient situations. Continuous assessment and cyclic improvements can be used to maximize the learning outcomes and clinical performance through the use of the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle.

Step By Step Instructions to write
NURS FPX 6085 Assessment 2

Contact us to receive step-by-step instructions.

Instruction file for
NURS FPX 6085 Assessment 2

Contact us to get the instruction file.

Scoring Guide for
NURS FPX 6085 Assessment 2

Contact us to get the scoring guide.

References for
NURS FPX 6085 Assessment 2

Abuzied, Y., Alshammary, S. A., Alhalahlah, T., & Somduth, S. (2023). Using FOCUS-PDSA quality improvement methodology model in healthcare: Process and outcomes. Global Journal on Quality and Safety in Healthcare, 6(2), 70–72. https://doi.org/10.36401/jqsh-22-19

Ahmed, N. Z., Hussain, N. A., None Badil, Murtaza, N. G., None Perdhoomun, Manzoor, N. Z., & Memon, N. R. (2025). Effectiveness of simulation-based learning on clinical skills competence among undergraduate nursing students. Indus Journal of Bioscience Research, 3(5), 284–287. https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i5.1142

Alhejaili, Bassam Alshahrani, Abdulrahman Muslihi, Reinald, P., Roque, M. Y., Alharbi, R. S., & Hammad Ali Fadlalmola. (2025). Nursing students’ satisfaction and self-confidence after short-term clinical preparation: A cross-sectional study. Nursing Reports, 15(9), 317–317. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15090317

Alkhelaiwi, W. A., Traynor, M., Rogers, K., & Wilson, I. (2024). Assessing the competence of nursing students in clinical practice: The clinical preceptors’ perspective. Healthcare, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12101031

Altınbaş, B. C., Çalık, K. Y., Erdöl, E. K., Kırkbir, İ. B., Güner, S. G., Tezel, M., Özmen, G. Ç., Erdöl, H., & Bulut, H. K. (2025). The effect of simulation-based laboratory training on undergraduate nursing students’ clinical skill, satisfaction, and self-confidence. BioMed Central (BMC) Nursing, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-04004-w

Brunt, B., & Morris, M. (2023). Nursing professional development: evidence-based practice. National Library of Medicine; StatPearls. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK589676/

Casia, P. F., Liu, F., Richmond, M. M., & Adams, C. (2025). The challenges and experiences of new graduate registered nurses (NGRNs) during the Covid-19 pandemic: An integrative review. Applied Nursing Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2025.151977

Elendu, C., Amaechi, D. C., Okatta, A. U., Amaechi, E. C., Elendu, T. C., Ezeh, C. P., & Elendu, I. D. (2024). The impact of simulation-based training in medical education: A review. Medicine, 103(27), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000038813

Ernawaty, E., Hariati, S., & Saleh, A. (2024). Program components, impact, and duration of implementing a new nurse orientation program in hospital contexts: A scoping review. International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100214

Gautam, S., Poudel, A., Paudyal, K., & Prajapati, M. M. (2023). Transition to professional practice: Perspectives of new nursing graduates of Nepal. BioMed Central Nursing, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01418-2

Geese, F., & Schmitt, K.-U. (2023). Interprofessional collaboration in complex patient care transition: A qualitative multi-perspective analysis. Healthcare, 11(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11030359

Guerrero, J. G., Rosales, N. S., & Castro, G. M. T. (2022). Impact of high‐fidelity simulation exposure of nursing students with their objective structured clinical examination: A quasi‐experimental study. Nursing Open, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1343

Ibrahim, R., Varghese, M., & Salim, S. S. (2024). A cross-sectional study on nursing preceptors’ perspectives about preceptorship and organizational support. SAGE Open Nursing, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608241288756

Joseph, H. B., Issac, A., George, A. G., Gautam, G., Jiji, M., & Mondal, S. (2022). Transitional challenges and role of preceptor among new nursing graduates. Journal of Caring Sciences, 11(2), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.34172/jcs.2022.16

Kavaklı & Dilek Konukbay. (2024). How simulation training for nursing students in emergency internships affects triage decision-making and anxiety: A quasi-experimental study. Heliyon, 10(15). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35626

Lysfjord, E. M., & Skarstein, S. (2024). Empowering leadership: A journey of growth and insight through a mentoring program for nurses in leadership positions. Journal of Healthcare Leadership, 16, 443–454. https://doi.org/10.2147/jhl.s482087

Mohammed, H. H., Abd, A., Nagwa Abd El-Fadil Afefy, Sherif, N. A., & Ibrahim, S. M. (2025). The effectiveness of nurse-led antenatal education on maternal self-efficacy: An evidence-based approach. BioMed Central (BMC) Nursing, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03471-5

Park, Y., Lee, S.-J., & Hur, Y. (2025). Facilitators, barriers, and future direction of high-fidelity simulation in nursing education: A qualitative descriptive study. BioMed Central Nursing, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03541-8

Pradhan, R., Beauvais, B., Ramamonjiarivelo, Z., Dolezel, D., Wood, D., & Shanmugam, R. (2024). Agency staffing and hospital financial performance: Insights and implications. Journal of Healthcare Leadership, Volume 16, 365–374. https://doi.org/10.2147/jhl.s470175

Reebals, C., Wood, T., & Markaki, A. (2021). Transition to practice for new nurse graduates: Barriers and mitigating strategies. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 44(4), 416–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945921997925

Salem, G. M. M., Hashimi, W., & El-Ashry, A. M. (2025). Reflective mindfulness and emotional regulation training to enhance nursing students’ self-awareness, understanding, and regulation: A mixed method randomized controlled trial. BioMed Central (BMC) Nursing, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03086-w

Valdes, E. G., Sembar, M. C., & Sadler, F. (2021). Onboarding new graduate nurses using assessment-driven personalized learning to improve knowledge, critical thinking, and nurse satisfaction. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 39(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/nnd.0000000000000805

Wang, B.-Y., Chang, Y.-C., & Fan, J.-Y. (2025). Effectiveness of debriefing for meaningful learning-enhanced simulation-based learning for emergency nurses’ perceptions, attitudes and coping strategies toward workplace violence: A stratified randomized trial. Nurse Education in Practice, 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104586

Yang, Y., & Liu, H. (2021). The effect of patient safety culture on nurses’ near-miss reporting intention: The moderating role of perceived severity of near misses. Journal of Research in Nursing, 26(1-2), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120979344

Capella Professors to choose from for
NURS-FPX6085

  • Buddy Wiltcher.
  • Lisa Kreeger.

FAQ’s For
NURS FPX 6085 Assessment 2

Question 1: What is NURS FPX 6085 Assessment 2 Problem Statement (PICOT)?

Answer 1: PICOT-based problem statement identifying nursing practice gap and patient outcomes.

← Previous Assessment: NURS FPX 6085 Assessment 1 | Next Assessment: NURS FPX 6085 Assessment 3 →

Don't have time to write? Get Free Quote

    Your information will be securely sent to and stored in Google Sheets for the purpose of processing your form submission.

    Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading

    Please enter your correct contact information to view the sample paper

    Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.