Skip to main content

Writink Services

NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 1 Risk Assessment

NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 1 Risk Assessment

NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 1 Risk Assessment

Student name

Capella University

NURS-FPX6020 Biopsychosocial Concepts for Advanced Nursing Practice 1

Professor Name

Submission Date

 

Risk Assessment

Risk assessment is a methodical way of determining and ranking public health risk. In Cumberland County, Virginia, it is essential in response to the impact of the hurricane floods. The response actions can be prioritized based on the identification of hazards, exposure routes, and populations at risk. The evaluation is a fusion of local data and community setting with evidence-based decision making, with an emphasis on the risks of infection control hazards that arise because of flooding in the area.

Decision-Making in Disaster Settings

Hurricanes are severe community health concerns, particularly in the spread of communicable diseases. Hurricanes are also one of the most destructive natural disasters that may cause catastrophic damage to communities and infrastructure (Arachchige et al., 2025). When hurricanes lead to floods in a rural area like Cumberland County, Virginia, flooding may overwhelm the existing healthcare services and discontinue regular services. When floodwaters are polluted with sewage, runoff from agricultural fields, and chemicals from the home, there is a greater chance of contracting waterborne illnesses (Leary, 2025), such as gastrointestinal infections. The lack of power, driveway blockages, and the impossibility of calling an ambulance impede access to healthcare by the residents, and overcrowded emergency shelters accelerate the transmission of respiratory and skin diseases. This is especially dangerous to the elderly citizens, the chronically ill, and young families. Under these conditions, a methodical decision-making process is required to swiftly assess the danger of infection and provide efficient, evidence-based interventions to secure the well-being of the individuals.

  • Distinguished Infection Control Model

In this assignment, a framework adopted by the World Health Organization, namely, Health Emergency and Disaster Risk Management (WHO Health EDRM) Framework, is selected due to its people-oriented approach to disaster preparedness and response based on its holistic and comprehensive approach to the disaster problem (Hung et al., 2024). Unlike general decision-making models, such as the OODA loop (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act), which is oriented towards rapid tactical response, the Health EDRM model is one of the only models that integrates prevention, preparedness, response, and recovery as a unique part of a public health setting. Its four key sections, risk assessment, emergency planning, community involvement, surveillance, and health system capacity, place it in a better position to manage the demand of infection control during flooding caused by hurricanes. Using the framework allows one to obtain a systematic evaluation of health risks, rank the population at risk, and combine limited local resources to prevent the spread of infectious diseases in the rural community of Cumberland County.

  • Identifying the Risks

Applying the WHO Health EDRM Framework to hurricane-induced flooding in Cumberland County helps reveal 5 major risks of infection and the consequent requirements that are related to their response. Fluvial waters are a higher source of waterborne disease, including leptospirosis, cholera, and vibriosis, and therefore emergency water treatment plants, water purification tablets, and education to the people on safe water usage are required (Leary, 2025).

Second, congested shelters put a person at risk of respiratory disease like respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), which necessitates the issuance of masks, vaccination, and proactive syndromic monitoring. Third, flood-borne debris and mold may lead to skin and soft tissue infections, and tetanus booster campaigns, wound care materials, as well as mobile health units to administer on-site treatment are needed. Fourth, standing water can be a breeding ground for mosquitoes, which risks the occurrence of the spread of the West Nile virus, dengue, and the need to use larvicide, supply mosquito nets, and conduct public health awareness campaigns (Leary, 2025). Lastly, the fact that regular healthcare services are disrupted during chronic conditions such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis illuminates the issue of mobile pharmacies and off-hours medication refills, as well as mechanisms that ensure continuity of care throughout the stages of disaster response and recovery.

  • Application of the Decision-Making Process

The process of decision-making followed 5 cyclic steps informed by the WHO Health EDRM Framework. First, risks have been identified by linking the reported consequences of hurricane-related flooding in Cumberland County to potential infectious disease risks. Second, a risk assessment was conducted within a few minutes based on the past flood history records with additional real-time reports of local and state health departments (Wright et al., 2020).

The third step involved ranking interventions based on the community vulnerability characteristics such as age structure, chronic disease burden, crowding in shelters, and the possibility of transmission. During the fourth stage, specific response actions were planned to suit the priorities of the Health EDRM, including both pharmaceutical (e.g., vaccines, medications) and non-pharmaceutical (e.g., sanitation, vector control, health education) response actions. Lastly, surveillance data, healthcare provider and community partner feedback, and after-action reviews also ensured continued monitoring to make adjustments to enhance infection control measures and enhance future preparedness to disasters.

Personalized Risk Identification Strategies

Following the hurricane, the unprecedented floods and infrastructural damage in Cumberland, Virginia, required that risk assessment be coupled with the demographics of the county, in addition to the exposure that the environment had to the people. As well, the floodwaters contaminated both personal wells and government water systems, increasing the chances of a water-borne infection such as leptospirosis and gastrointestinal disease (Wade, 2022). With the experience of latency in water testing and purification services, most rural homesteads based on private wells were exposed to the greater agendas of exposure to pathogens and farm runoff (España et al., 2024). Lasting power outages during hot and humid weather only increased the health risks to a greater extent, and particularly to individuals with chronic respiratory and heart issues who were dependent on air conditioning and electrically powered medical devices.

Cumberland had certain vulnerable groups of people in its demographics. The older generation who lived remotely found it hard to access drug stores and health institutions, leading to disruption in medication treatment of chronic illnesses like hypertension and diabetes (Waddell et al., 2021). The children living in high-population temporary shelters had more exposure to respiratory and gastrointestinal infections due to poor sanitation facilities. The access to timely and comprehensible health messages, as well as the delay in the response to such basic actions as boiling water or throwing away rotting food, frustrated low-income households and non-English-speaking residents.

The farmers and field workers were also exposed to the breeding of mosquitoes in still water, which elevated the chances of being infected by a vector-borne disease, and also the chances of skin infections and heat illness due to direct contact with the infected floodwater. Specific solutions to these threats were targeted. The map of the geographic information system (GIS) data in the form of flood depth superimposed on the demographic variables, such as age, language, and income levels, also defined the mobile health units and the sites of hygiene kits distribution (Shrestha et al., 2025). Mobile pharmacies served the purpose of continuity of chronic care in remote communities, and education campaigns aimed at the culture were launched to promote safe water practices and prevent infection among shelter residents. As an intervention strategy, the pertinence of the environmental risk profiles to the unique requirements of the varied population of Cumberland resulted in the reduction of infection rates and resilience levels within the community in the aftermath of the disaster.

  • Uncertainty

Whether the infections that follow hurricanes are really as large as thought in Cumberland remains unclear because the underreporting by rural regions offers a false negative to the disease burden. Demographic data does not normally record the transitional population, like agricultural workers, and thus, the key threats are not fulfilled (Dadson et al., 2025). Cultural and language barriers also delay symptom and care-seeking reporting. Qualitative research and community involvement are also found to be needed to provide a more precise risk portrait and better plan the endeavors with incomplete GIS and infrastructural data.

Data-Driven Health Trend Analysis

A mix of epidemiologic surveillance and system-level data reveals the complete picture of the trends of infection and health outcomes following disasters in Cumberland County. According to historical data provided by the reportable disease system in Virginia and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports, it is suggested that there has been a steady increase in bacterial disease transmitted by water in the previous 20 years, both as a result of warmer surface waters and the improved reporting of the diseases. This growing trend also highlights the importance of water-borne bacterial risks receiving special consideration in post-hurricane preparedness and response planning in the region. In the aftermath of the hurricane, local surveillance recorded an abrupt increase in the number of mosquitoes that are responsible for the West Nile Virus and Zika virus-associated disease, most of which happened in one week after the floods (Leary, 2025).

The elderly were disproportionately hit, and the case fatality ratios were extremely high compared to expectations. These findings underline the necessity of water safety interventions, educating people about floodwater hazards, and providing safe drinking water. Increases in severe wound infections and septicemia were also recorded in public health reporting and hospital discharge records, which strained the available local healthcare, such as surgical and critical care facilities. This growth of such cases resembles the growing role of climatic events in the well-being of the population and the way in which flooding can contribute to the risk of exposure to pathogenic bacteria (Leary, 2025). Taken together, these trends affirm the need to further monitor, promptly report, and specifically direct resources like mobile medical units and wound dressing material in a bid to protect the most vulnerable groups of the people of Cumberland and prevent any preventable deaths in case of a future disaster.

  • Relevance

The concurrent analysis of surveillance reports, long-term trends of the infection, and patterns of healthcare use support why waterborne and mosquito-borne viruses such as West Nile Virus and Zika virus should be prioritized in the post-storm infection control plan of Cumberland. The contamination caused by flooding and rising temperatures offered the ideal environment to promote the growth of bacteria, and the rapid increase in the number of cases after the storm and high mortality rates revealed the dire need to intervene with the issue of public health on time (Leary, 2025). The implementation of targeted interventions like public advisories on safe water consumption, distribution of purification materials, and pre-positioning of important antibiotics has been identified as an important measure to protect the inhabitants. More so, the level of hospital preparedness must be increased in the form of surge planning, wound care supplies, and personnel training to prevent the saturation of the system and avoidable deaths in future storms.

Effective Community Risk Communication

Risk communication in post-hurricane Cumberland needed to be effective by incorporating clear, timely, and culturally suitable messages so that the residents could take risk-mitigating actions. The local public health officials used the familiar communication mediums, including county radio stations, social media updates, and community bulletin boards, to distribute the boil-water notices, safe shelter hygiene practices, and wound-care instructions. The consistency of messages across all channels helped reduce confusion, and collaborating with the local communities, churches, and local volunteer networks helped to achieve the goal of establishing trust and encouraging compliance within the community.

Cumberland had several groups that had different communication barriers that required a different solution. Older people who have less internet access or are hard of hearing were served with flying papers, big-print communications, and announcements that were broadcast in senior centers (CDC, 2021). The age-related materials and hygiene demonstrations given to parents of young children within the shelters contributed to the reduction of respiratory and gastrointestinal infections. The residents who have low income and are non-English speakers were offered the translation of materials, culturally relevant examples, and support of bilingual community health workers to help them understand (CDC, 2021). Customizing communication plans to meet the requirements of each population, including low-literacy visual strategies to engage low-literacy homes, allowed the public health teams to promote knowledge in the community, facilitate the adoption of protective behaviors, and support in minimizing the post-disaster infection rates in Cumberland.

Conclusion

In Cumberland, risks of waterborne, respiratory, skin, vector-borne, and chronic care were revealed after the application of the WHO Health EDRM strategy. Safe water delivery, vaccines, wound care kits, control of vectors, and mobile pharmacies were safe interventions. Community education and awareness campaigns also played a vital role in promoting preventive behaviors and early reporting of symptoms. The most vulnerable communities were dealt with by GIS mapping. Communication and surveillance reduced the spread of the disease and enhanced the diversity of the community.

Need help with NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 1? Get expert step-by-step guidance, fast solutions, and proven strategies to improve your grades.

Step By Step Instructions to write
NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 1

Contact us to receive step-by-step instructions.

Instruction file for
NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 1

Contact us to get the instruction file.

Scoring Guide for
NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 1

Contact us to get the scoring guide.

References for
NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 1

Arachchige, S. M., Pradhan, B., & Park, H.-J. (2025). A critical review of hurricane risk assessment models and predictive frameworks. Geoscience Frontiers, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102012

CDC. (2021). Access and functional needs toolkit integrating a community partner network to inform risk communication strategies, Center for Preparedness and Response. https://www.cdc.gov/readiness/media/pdfs/
CDC_Access_and_Functional_Needs_Toolkit_March2021.pdf

Dadson, Y. A., Gayle, D. M. B., Ramenzoni, V., & Gilmore, E. A. (2025). Experiences of Immigrants during disasters in the US: A systematic literature review. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 27(1), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-024-01649-8

España, J. D. A., Álvarez, D. R., Luna, C., & Morales, A. J. R. (2024). Infectious disease outbreaks in the wake of natural flood disasters: Global patterns and local implications. Le Infezioni in Medicina, 32(4), 451–462. https://doi.org/10.53854/liim-3204-4

Hung, K. K. C., MacDermot, M. K., Hui, T. S. I., Chan, S. Y., Mashino, S., Mok, C. P. Y., Leung, P. H., Kayano, R., Abrahams, J., Wong, C. S., Chan, E. Y. Y., & Graham, C. A. (2024). Mapping study for health emergency and disaster risk management competencies and curricula: literature review and cross-sectional survey. Globalization and Health, 20(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-023-01010-y

NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 1 Risk Assessment

Leary, N. (2025). Climate Risks and Resilience in Cumberland County: Synthesis Report. https://www.dickinson.edu/download/downloads/id/16410/
climate_risks_and_resilience_in_cumberland_county_synthesis_report.pdf

Shrestha, S., Dewasis-Dahal, Bishal-Poudel, Mandip-Banjara, & Kalra, A. (2025). Flood susceptibility analysis with integrated geographic information system and analytical hierarchy process: A multi-criteria framework for risk assessment and mitigation. Water, 17(7), 937. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17070937

Waddell, S. L., Jayaweera, D. T., Mirsaeidi, M., Beier, J. C., & Kumar, N. (2021). Perspectives on the health effects of hurricanes: A review and challenges. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052756

Wade, T. (2022). Health risks associated with sea level rise. National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health | NCCEH – CCSNE. https://ncceh.ca/resources/evidence-reviews/health-risks-associated-sea-level-rise

Wright, N., Fagan, L., Lapitan, J. M., Kayano, R., Abrahams, J., Huda, Q., & Murray, V. (2020). Health emergency and disaster risk management: Five years into implementation of the Sendai framework. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 11(2), 206–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-020-00274-x

Capella Professors to choose from for
NURS FPX 6020

  • Buddy Wiltcher.
  • JacQualine Abbe.

FAQ’s For
NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 1

Question 1: Where can I find assessment help for NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 1?

Answer 1: You can find assessment help for NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 1 at writinkservices.com.

Question 2: What is NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 1 Risk Assessment?

Answer 2: A systematic analysis of community health risks after disasters.

Next Assessment:

→ NURS FPX 6020 Assessment 2

Don't have time to write? Get Free Quote

    Your information will be securely sent to and stored in Google Sheets for the purpose of processing your form submission.

    Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading

    Please enter your correct contact information to view the sample paper

    Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.