Skip to main content

Writink Services

NURS FPX 4905 Assessment 3 Technology and Professional Standards

NURS FPX 4905 Assessment 3 Technology and Professional Standards

NURS FPX 4905 Assessment 3 Technology and Professional Standards

Student name

Capella University

NURS-FPX4905 Capstone Project for Nursing

Professor Name

Submission Date

 

Technology and Professional Standards

Technology and professional standards play a crucial role in the safe and effective care of substance use disorder (SUD) in the context of SUD treatment facilities, such as Immersion Residential Center. One of the main problems that was observed during my practicum was the absence of continuity of care following the detox, which increases the likelihood of relapse. Such tools as electronic health records (EHRs) and telehealth can facilitate the process of managing coordination and follow-up care. Ethical, evidence-based, and patient-centered practice is guaranteed by compliance with professional standards formulated by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), the American Nurses Association (ANA), and The Joint Commission.

Clarifying Role in Change Process

Being a BSN-prepared Registered Nurse (RN) means that I am equipped to detect the gaps in the system, support patient-centered care, and foster evidence-based and ethical practices, especially in high-stakes situations, such as post-detox discharge. Relying on the ANA Code of Ethics and professional standards, BSN nurses are important to quality improvement and patient safety, particularly in one of the highest-risk groups, including SUDs (Dellasega & Kanaskie, 2021). 

When I was on my practicum at Immersion Residential Center, I found out that most of the patients were discharged with no specific follow-up strategies. My role as a student was an observational one, but I helped in data collection and supervisors discussing how to enhance continuity of care. My contribution in a future RN position would be to help introduce a standardized transition-of-care procedure through collaboration with case managers, EHRs to refer to patients, and provide them with clear and individualized recovery plans upon discharge.

The Florida Nurse Practice Act (Chapter 464, Florida Statutes) states that RNs have the duty of observing, assessing, intervening, and evaluating patients as well as playing a role in the development and implementation of nursing care strategies (Butler and Martin, 2023). The act also promotes nurses being involved in the quality assurance and improved programs. In this respect, RN is empowered and obligated in the ethical sense to spot and take action on the care lapses that affect patient outcomes. It is the legal basis under which Florida nurses are authorized not only to follow the standards but also to guide the change of processes, particularly when it comes to the work with vulnerable groups, like patients in detox and SUDs rehabilitation.

Interprofessional Collaboration Implementation Overview

In Immersion Residential Center, interprofessional collaboration in nursing plays a crucial role in providing holistic care to those individuals who are in detox and rehabilitation due to SUDs. Throughout my practicum, I was able to see collaboration between nurses, physicians, therapists and case managers in treatment and discharge planning. One of the areas that needs improvement is the continuity of care after the detox process with the help of the outpatient care providers, mental health specialists, and social workers (Ojo et al., 2024). As a student, I facilitate the follow-up by attending team meetings, recording observations, and reporting patient needs. As an RN in the future, I would enhance interprofessional collaboration by using shared EHRs, scheduling case conferences, and conducting frequent interprofessional huddles to close the care gaps, establish objectives, and provide safe and person-centered transitions.

Benefits

The interprofessional collaboration in this environment has significant advantages. It results in better patient safety, less fragmentation of care, and better quality of care due to the shared knowledge and accountability. Patients are being given a more holistic care that will cater to both the physical and mental needs of the patients. In the case of staff, collaboration leads to respect, enhanced communication, and fewer burnout cases because of the shared workload and solving problems (Tingvold and Munkejord, 2020). This method of team approach will ultimately help in recovery in the long term and reduce the chances of readmission or failure of treatment.

Government Agency Practice Guidelines

Various government and regulatory bodies have offered good directions and guidelines concerning the management of SUDs in detox and residential rehabilitation facilities such as Immersion Residential Center. An example of this accreditation is the Joint Commission that accredits behavioral health units and focuses on patient safety, continuity of care and evidence-based practice in addiction treatment (Joint Commission, 2025). They recommend regular assessment of patients, mass screening of co-morbid mental illnesses, and continuous personnel education to maintain the quality of care. In the same way, the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI) facilitates the monitoring of nursing-sensitive outcomes, including patient falls, restraints, and nurse satisfaction, which can be used to determine the quality of detox care (Gormley et al., 2024).

Also, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is a regulatory authority that implements reimbursement rules and regulations of behavioral health. CMS is urging facilities to implement person-centered models of care, participate in coordinated care, and achieve value-based care standards (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2023). Their suggestions also favor incorporating behavioral health and primary care, enhancing access to medication-assisted treatment (MAT), and decreasing unnecessary readmissions. The adherence to the standards of these agencies would not only guarantee the high quality of care but also guarantee funding and accreditation that are essential for the sustainability of such facilities.

Assumptions

The suggestions are anchored on major assumptions. If the healthcare organizations possess sufficient resources to implement it, the staff will be trained and eager to implement evidence-based practices, and patients will experience coordinated care (Kurpas et al., 2021). The agencies, such as the Joint Commission and CMS, presume that adherence to standards is beneficial in terms of safety, outcomes, and efficiency (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2023). There is also an assumption that performance gaps are identified by virtue of data-driven monitoring, including by NDNQI, and that further performance-enhancing patient care.

Clinical Technology Addressing Practice Issues

Immersion Residential Center applies several technologies in the treatment of clients with SUDs and comorbid mental health issues at the moment. The technologies that are essential are EHRs to store client histories, treatment plans, and medication records; teletherapy tools to have individual or group counseling sessions remotely; and digital assessment tools to monitor the progress and symptoms of the client (The Immersion Program, 2024).

Also, mobile applications and web-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) applications can help to continue therapy outside the office, offering clients mindfulness and journaling, and relapse prevention tools. The technologies have evident advantages, yet there are a few problems that have been noted when in use. Due to the constant disruption of internet connectivity and platform glitches, teletherapy sessions are interrupted, and this interrupts the continuity of care (The Immersion Program, 2024). A large number of clients do not have access to or the technical expertise to use secure and private environments, posing a great challenge to complete participation in virtual services.

EHRs and therapy applications are also not well-integrated and create a gap in communication between members of the interdisciplinary team, causing delays in care coordination (The Immersion Program, 2024). Moreover, employees have complained that they did not receive enough training on the usage of technology, which restrains the efficiency and effectiveness of offering care digitally. In spite of these shortcomings, the application of technology has positively influenced the overall results in the facility. Bennion et al. (2025) report that virtual platforms are more flexible and allow clients to get therapy and support more frequently, which increases treatment program engagement and retention.

This is in line with the results that were realized in the Immersion Residential Center, where the level of access has enhanced the rate of participation in the continuous therapy sessions. EHR systems have increased communication between healthcare providers and have made medication safety and care planning easier. Mental health monitoring and behavioral therapy digital tools also enable clinicians to recognize high-risk behaviors in time and proactively respond to them. Consequently, the application of technology at Immersion has assisted in enhancing clinical and patient satisfaction, especially by increasing access and providing more personalized and data-informed care.

Summarizing Available Technology with Pros and Cons

The application of multiple technologies to enhance the results in SUD treatment facilities, particularly in detox and residential treatment centers, has significant support in the literature. EHRs will improve provider-provider communication, medication safety, and documentation (Hamad and Bah, 2022). Online CBT initiatives and online counseling platforms can be more effective in making behavioral interventions more accessible, particularly to those clients who are not able to access them because of transportation or time limitations (Gkintoni et al., 2025). The mHealth applications, reSET^{®} to be used in the recovery of SUD, provide the client with relapse prevention, daily checks, and live support, increasing client engagement (Businelle et al., 2024).

There are, however, several limitations that inhibit the successful utilization of technology in clinical settings. They are the issues of preserving the privacy and confidentiality of patients during virtual sessions (McGraw & Mandl, 2021). Moreover, there are differences in access to trustworthy internet or other digital devices, which pose obstacles to certain clients (Graves et al., 2021). The successful utilization of those tools also demands the presence of supplementary training among the staff to make them competent and confident in providing technology-based care.

Immersion Residential Center employs EHRs and simple teletherapy but fails to make use of some useful technologies. Wearable biosensors (e.g., stress-detecting wristbands) or AI-based platforms that can predict relapse (which proved to be more effective in early intervention) are not provided so far (Kapogianni et al., 2025). On the same note, gamified recovery applications and peer support systems are also suggested but do not existent. The interventions of these tools have the potential to enhance both personalized, data-driven care and post-discharge care (through continuous support), particularly during off-hours, as well as to combat the problem of digital literacy and access (Gustavson et al., 2024).

Technology Implementation Issue, Challenges, and Solutions

Some of the barriers are likely to be met in the implementation of technologies in institutions like Immersion Residential Center, including wearable biosensors, AI-based relapse prediction applications, and health applications. The biggest challenges concern cost and funding because of initial investments, maintenance, and training of staff (Nascimento et al., 2023). The resistance to adopting is also caused by staff resistance, which is frequently based on unfamiliarity, workloads, data privacy concerns, and clients’ low digital literacy.

The facility can go through grants, tech partnerships or government mental health programs to get over these challenges. The implementation should be gradual and come with pilot testing and extensive staff training to facilitate resistance. The HIPAA-compliant platforms and open consent procedures should be used to address privacy issues. Enabling digital literacy and emphasizing such benefits of technology as 24/7 support and alerts about early relapse can be used to create acceptance (Chadha et al., 2024). Both the staff and the clients should be included in the process of planning so that the technology can be in tune with the user’s needs and clinical objectives.

Conclusion

The argument has shown the problem of poor continuity of care within the drug and alcohol detox and residential rehabilitation facility, especially at Immersion Residential Center. This issue has a great impact on patient safety, quality of care, and health care costs. The position of the BSN-prepared nurses was investigated regarding professional standards and the top process enhancements. The role of interprofessional collaboration, recommendations by the government agencies, and the adoption of technology were highlighted.

Need help with NURS FPX 4905 Assessment 3? Get expert step-by-step guidance with Writink Services to boost your grades and succeed. Start today!

Step By Step Instructions For
NURS FPX 4905 Assessment 3

Contact us to receive step-by-step instructions.

Instruction file for
NURS FPX 4905 Assessment 3

Contact us to get the instruction file.

Scoring Guide for
NURS FPX 4905 Assessment 3

Contact us to get the scoring guide.

References for
NURS FPX 4905 Assessment 3

Bennion, M., Blakemore, A., Lovell, K., & Bee, P. (2025). Barriers and facilitators to engagement with between-session work for low-intensity cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)-based interventions: A qualitative exploration of practitioner perceptions. BioMed Central Psychiatry25(1), e79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06501-3

Businelle, M. S., Perski, O., Hébert, E. T., & Kendzor, D. E. (2024). Mobile health interventions for substance use disorders. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology20(1), 49-76. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-080822-042337

Butler, T. J. T., & Martin, R. L. (2023). Florida nursing laws and rules. NIH; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK532859/

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2023, August 14). Value-Based Care. Cms.gov. https://www.cms.gov/priorities/innovation/key-concepts/value-based-care

Chadha, Y., Patil, R., Toshniwal, S., & Sinha, N. (2024). Internet addiction management: A comprehensive review of clinical interventions and modalities. Cureus16(3), e55466. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.55466

The Immersion Program. (2024, June 4). Technology in mental health support & therapy | The Immersion Program. Immersionrecovery.org. https://www.immersionrecovery.com/role-technology-mental-health-support-therapy/

Dellasega, C., & Kanaskie, M. L. (2021). Nursing ethics in an era of pandemic. Applied Nursing Research62(62), 151508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2021.151508

Gkintoni, E., Vassilopoulos, S. P., & Nikolaou, G. (2025). Next-generation cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression: Integrating digital tools, teletherapy, and personalization for enhanced mental health outcomes. Medicina61(3), 431. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61030431

Graves, J. M., Abshire, D. A., Amiri, S., & Mackelprang, J. L. (2021). Disparities in technology and broadband internet access across rurality. Family & Community Health44(4), 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1097/fch.0000000000000306

Gormley, E., Connolly, M., & Ryder, M. (2024). The development of nursing-sensitive indicators: A critical discussion. International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances7(7), e100227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100227

NURS FPX 4905 Assessment 3 Technology and Professional Standards

Gustavson, A. M., Miller, M. J., Boening, N., Hudson, E. M., Wisdom, J. P., Burke, R. E., & Hagedorn, H. J. (2024). Identifying factors influencing emerging innovations in hospital discharge decision making in response to system stress: A qualitative study. BioMed Central Health Services Research24(1), e1293. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11784-5

Hamad, M. M. E., & Bah, S. (2022). Impact of implementing electronic health records on medication safety at an HIMSS Stage 6 hospital: The pharmacist’s perspective. Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy75(4), 267–275. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524548/

Joint Commission. (2025). Behavioral Health Care & Human Services Accreditation Program. Jointcommission.org. https://www.jointcommission.org/en-us/accreditation/behavioral-health-care-and-human-services

Kapogianni, N.-A., Sideraki, A., & Anagnostopoulos, C.-N. (2025). Using smartwatches in stress management, mental health, and well-being: A systematic review. Algorithms18(7), e419. https://doi.org/10.3390/a18070419

Kurpas, D., Wojtas, D. S., Shpakou, A., Halata, D., Mohos, A., Skarbaliene, A., Dumitra, G., Klimatckaia, L., Bendova, J., & Tkachenko, V. (2021). The advantages and disadvantages of integrated care implementation in central and eastern Europe – perspective from 9 CEE countries. International Journal of Integrated Care21(4) e14. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5632

McGraw, D., & Mandl, K. D. (2021). Privacy protections to encourage use of health-relevant digital data in a learning health system. Nature Partner Journal Digital Medicine4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-00362-8

Nascimento, I. J. B., Abdulazeem, H., Vasanthan, L. T., Martinez, E. Z., Zucoloto, M. L., Østengaard, L., Muscat, N. A., Zapata, T., & Ortiz, D. N. (2023). Barriers and facilitators to utilizing digital health technologies by healthcare professionals. Nature Partner Journal Digital Medicine6(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00899-4

Ojo, S., Okoye, T. O., Olaniyi, S. A., Ofochukwu, V. C., Obi, M. O., Nwokolo, A. S., Okeke-Moffatt, C., Iyun, O. B., Idemudia, E. A., Obodo, O. R., Mokwenye, V. C., & Okobi, O. E. (2024). Ensuring continuity of care: Effective strategies for the post-hospitalization transition of psychiatric patients in a family medicine outpatient clinic. Cureus16(1), e52263. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.52263

Tingvold, L., & Munkejord, M. C. (2020). Shared goals, communication and mutual respect in multicultural staff teams: A relational coordination perspective. Nursing Open8(2), 957–965. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.704

Capella Professors to choose from for
NURS-FPX4905

  • Kristina Shelton.
  • Evelyn Shinn.

FAQ’s For
NURS FPX 4905 Assessment 3

Question 1: Where can I find assessment help for NURS FPX 4905 Assessment 3?

Answer 1: You can find assessment help for NURS FPX 4905 Assessment 3 at writinkservices.com.

Question 2: What is NURS FPX 4905 Assessment 3 Technology and Professional Standards?

Answer 2: NURS FPX 4905 Assessment 3 focuses on technology use and professional standards in nursing.

← Previous Assessment: NURS FPX 4905 Assessment 2 | Next Assessment: NURS FPX 4905 Assessment 4 

Don't have time to write? Get Free Quote

    Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading

    Please enter your correct contact information to view the sample paper

    Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.