ETH 316 Week 1 Ethics Essay

Ethics Essay

Deontological ethics, utilitarianism, and virtue theory are three distinct ethical theories. This essay will define each theory to help readers gain a deeper comprehension of the various perspectives on morality and ethics. This paper will likewise make sense of the contrast between every one of them and give an individual guide to assist better with figuring out these hypotheses, in actuality, circumstances.

Level One Heading Virtue Theory is a broad term for theories that emphasize virtue and character in moral philosophy rather than doing one’s duty or acting to bring about good outcomes. An ideal ethicist is probably going to offer you this sort of moral guidance: ” In your situation, behave as a moral person would” (Athanassoulis, 2015). This theory asks, to put it simply, whether people are judged by their actions or their character. People are typically in a fight between themselves on the best way to pass judgment on somebody they have never met, particularly on the off chance that they have heard “bits of gossip” about someone in particular. Someone puts their morals and ethics to the test here.

According to Mas, Monroe, & Till (2013), utilitarianism emphasizes the need to produce the greatest number of laughs for the greatest number of people. Since this hypothesis zeros in more on creating more “great” results, it would be viewed as a consequentialist hypothesis. It would be unethical and wrong if the actions taken caused more harm than good. One must determine whether they will be left feeling satisfied in order to determine whether what is being done will result in a positive outcome. You have done the right thing if you are left feeling content.

Deontological morals are the standardizing moral place that passes judgment on the profound quality of activity in light of the activity’s adherence to a standard or rules (“Deontological Morals,” 2015). The moral obligation to act in the right way is the primary focus of this theory. Consider the obligations one might have to their family as an example to better comprehend this theory. Clients are the responsibility of lawyers. Because families or lawyers may not always agree with what family members or clients are doing, they have a moral obligation to support them.

A firsthand account of the virtue theory; a new boss had a terrible talk that he was difficult to work with. This manager demanded too much, was arrogant, and just hard to please. I had to decide whether to judge this person based on what everyone had told me or on my own experience after hearing all of these things. I made the decision to make my own judgments, and I found that my experience was completely different. My supervisor was very nice to me; in fact, he was aware of what was being said, but he chose to keep silent and let people decide for themselves if the rumors were true.

Conclusion

When considering the three distinct ethical theories presented above, it may be challenging to ascertain which one is being utilized or how to select the appropriate one. The most effective method for determining which ethic theory should be applied to a particular circumstance will be to evaluate each decision and comprehend the required outcome. On occasion, every one of the three speculations is applied consistently. These are speculations illustrated to assist better with understanding what is moral “right” and “wrong.”